Saved

Archaeological site, Monte Porzio Catone (RM)

41°48′54″ N, 12°41′27″ E

No photo on Wikimedia Commons yet

Upload a photo to Commons

Archaeological site

Complesso archeologico del Barco Borghese

Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Lazio

Directions

At a glance

Coordinates
41°48′54″ N, 12°41′27″ E
Address
Via Frascati, 62, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone

Getting there

FrascatiTrain, nearest
1.4 km as the crow flies
Complesso archeologico del Barco BorgheseVia Frascati, 62, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone
Aeroporto di Roma-Ciampino8.3 km

Distances are as the crow flies, not walking or driving.

Loading map…

The town

Things to see in Monte Porzio Catone8,581 inhabitants, 451 m above sea level. 21 historic places in the town.PhotoRenato Clementi, CC BY-SA 3.021 places

Do you know this place?

We are missing a description and photos. The data comes from open projects: if you add it there, it appears here at the next update.

More archaeological sites in Lazio

  • UNESCO
  • Free 1st Sunday
Archaeological site, 82 AD

Colosseum

Rome (RM)

Opening hours
  • Free 1st Sunday
Archaeological site, 7th century BC

Ostia

Fiumicino (RM)

Opening hours

See all archaeological sites in Lazio

Frequently asked questions

Where is Complesso archeologico del Barco Borghese?

Complesso archeologico del Barco Borghese is in Monte Porzio Catone, in the province of Roma (Lazio), Italy. Address: Via Frascati, 62, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone. GPS coordinates: 41.81505, 12.69089.

What are the opening hours of Complesso archeologico del Barco Borghese?

According to OpenStreetMap the opening hours are: Friday to Sunday: from 11:30, from 16:00, from 18:00. Always check the official website before your visit.

What else is there to see near Complesso archeologico del Barco Borghese?

Nearby you’ll find: Barco Borghese (500 m away), Villa Parisi (600 m away), Villa Mondragone (800 m away).

Sources and licences

Data. Wikidata (CC0); opening hours and contacts OpenStreetMap (ODbL).

Updated 28 October 2026. All sources and licences

Spotted a mistake? Fix it on OpenStreetMap