Saved
Villa Verlicchi
Original photo1 of 3 photos

Photo: Maddy16869, CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Historic villa / palace, 19th century

Villa Verlicchi

Villa in Lavezzola - Conselice (RA)

Conselice (RA), Emilia-Romagna

Directions

At a glance

Period
Modern era, 19th century
Protection
Italian national heritage
Coordinates
44°33′52″ N, 11°52′22″ E
Address
via Bastia 71 ‒ Lavezzola ‒ Conselice (RA)

Timeline

  1. 19th centuryBuilt

Events and people from Wikidata (CC0).

Photos

Getting there

LavezzolaTrain, nearest
800 m as the crow flies
Villa Verlicchivia Bastia 71 ‒ Lavezzola ‒ Conselice (RA)
Aeroporto Gastone Novelli35.8 km

Distances are as the crow flies, not walking or driving.

Loading map…

Do you know this place?

We are missing the opening hours and a description. The data comes from open projects: if you add it there, it appears here at the next update.

More historic villas and palaces in Emilia-Romagna

See all historic villas and palaces in Emilia-Romagna

Things to see in Conselice: 2 historic places

Frequently asked questions

Where is Villa Verlicchi?

Villa Verlicchi is in Conselice, in the province of Ravenna (Emilia-Romagna), Italy. Address: via Bastia 71 ‒ Lavezzola ‒ Conselice (RA). GPS coordinates: 44.56456, 11.87278.

How old is Villa Verlicchi?

Wikidata dates it to the 19th century.

What else is there to see near Villa Verlicchi?

Nearby you’ll find: San Domenico, Argenta (6.8 km away), Carlo Venturini Cultural Center (13.7 km away), Casa natale di Vincenzo Monti (13.8 km away).

Sources and licences

Data. Wikidata (CC0); opening hours and contacts OpenStreetMap (ODbL).

Photos. Wikimedia Commons, author and licence on every image.

Credits for the 3 photos
  1. Lavezzola - Villa Verlicchi - 2023-09-23 16-34-26 001 — Maddy16869, CC BY-SA 4.0
  2. Conselice - Villa Verlicchi - 2023-09-23 16-35-59 001 — Maddy16869, CC BY-SA 4.0
  3. Lavezzola - Villa Verlicchi - 2023-09-23 16-37-43 001 — Maddy16869, CC BY-SA 4.0

Updated 28 October 2026. All sources and licences

Spotted a mistake? Fix it on OpenStreetMap